| 615 | 0 | 124 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
人工智能的嵌入不仅推动了治理工具与制度结构的创新,更促使治理理性从制度理性、工具理性、价值理性向认知理性演化。从治理理性演化的理论视角出发,基于系统科学与认知智能理论的分析表明,“智能治理”是“人工智能+”行动下公共治理的新范式。在理论生成维度,智能治理通过算法智能、协同智能与制度智能的耦合,构建以认知生成为核心的本体论模型,并确立了生成式与模拟式的认识论基础。在运行逻辑维度,其具象化为算法结构的计算流程、协同体系的作业网络与制度机制的调节回路,通过智能中枢的系统集成实现“感知—决策—执行—反馈”的动态闭环。智能治理由此完成了治理理性的再组织,推动国家治理现代化由制度驱动向认知驱动转型。将人工智能纳入治理理性演化框架,揭示了智能治理的理论生成逻辑与运行机制,为理解“人工智能+”时代的公共治理变革提供了新的分析视角。
Abstract:The embedding of AI not only promotes innovation in governance tools and institutional structures but also drives the evolution of governance rationality from institutional, instrumental, and value rationality to cognitive rationality. From the theoretical perspective of rationality evolution and utilizing systems science and cognitive intelligence theories, this study proposes “Intelligent Governance” as a new paradigm of public governance under the”“AI+” initiative. In terms of theoretical generation, Intelligent Governance constructs an ontological model centered on cognitive generation through the coupling of algorithmic intelligence, collaborative intelligence, and institutional intelligence, establishing an epistemological foundation based on generative and simulative logic. In terms of operational logic, it materializes into the computational processes of algorithmic structures, the operational networks of collaborative systems, and the regulatory loops of institutional mechanisms, achieving a dynamic closed loop of “sensing-decision-execution-feedback” through the integration of an intelligent hub. Consequently, Intelligent Governance achieves the reorganization of governance rationality, promoting the transformation of national governance modernization from being institution-driven to cognition-driven. By incorporating AI into the framework of governance rationality evolution, this study reveals the theoretical generation logic and operational mechanisms of Intelligent Governance, providing a new analytical perspective for understanding public governance reform in the “AI+” era.
[1]国务院关于深入实施“人工智能+”行动的意见:国发[2025]11号[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2025/issue_12266/202509/content_7039598.html,2025-10-11.
[2]梁正,王尚瑞.人工智能与公共治理实证研究前沿:一项文献综述[J].公共管理评论,2023,(3).
[3]颜佳华,王张华.数字治理、数据治理、智能治理与智慧治理概念及其关系辨析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(5).
[4]Osborne S P.The New Public Governance?[J].Public Management Review,2006,(3).
[5]Moore M H.Creating Public Value:Strategic Management in Government[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1997.
[6]Meijer A,Bolívar M P R.Governing the Smart City:a Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance[J].International Review of Administrative Sciences,2016,(2).
[7]Zuiderwijk A,Chen Y C,Salem F.Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance:A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda[J].Government Information Quarterly,2021,(3).
[8]Kaiser Z A.Smart Governance for Smart Cities and Nations[J].Journal of Economy and Technology,2024,(2).
[9]李祥文,宋程,丁帅.人机协同决策中的人因能力评估研究[J].中国管理科学,2024,(3).
[10]Neumann O,Guirguis K,Steiner R.Exploring Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Organizations:a Comparative Case Study[J].Public Management Review,2024,(1).
[11]孟天广,吴培琳.算法政治:算法介入国家治理的耦合逻辑与政治效应[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(5).
[12]刘艳红,姜文智.个人法益视角下数据共享与跨境流通的法律保护体系构建[J].浙江工商大学学报,2025,(1).
[13]Danaher J.The Threat of Algocracy:Reality,Resistance and Accommodation[J].Philosophy & Technology,2016,(3).
[14]Katzenbach C,Ulbricht L.Algorithmic Governance[J].Internet Policy Review,2019,(4).
[15]Danaher J,Hogan M J,Noone C,et al.Algorithmic Governance:Developing a Research Agenda Through the Power of Collective Intelligence[J].Big Data & Society,2017,(2).
[16]李辉,王娜,王龙.总体国家安全观视域下的算力安全治理研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2025,(3).
[17]李立清,栾文婷.生成式人工智能嵌入公共服务治理的作用机理与风险防范[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,(3).
[18]陈凯华,王硕,张超,等.加强面向场景需求的公共治理信息技术预见[J].中国科学院院刊,2025,(10).
基本信息:
DOI:10.16326/j.cnki.1008-7168.2026.01.002
中图分类号:D630;TP18
引用信息:
[1]米加宁,刘润泽.智能治理:人工智能+行动驱动的公共治理范式变革[J].天津行政学院学报,2026,28(01):17-28.DOI:10.16326/j.cnki.1008-7168.2026.01.002.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“因地制宜发展新质生产力的案例比较研究”(25&ZD091)
2025-12-29
2025-12-29
2025-12-29