天津行政学院学报

情感治理作为基层治理的新模式，被认为能够有效弥补制度治理与技术治理中的“温度不足”。然而，情感治理在实践中因过度依赖动员策略，面临可持续性困境和情感耗竭问题。广东省梅州市蕉岭县G镇的情感治理案例研究阐释了情感资源在基层治理中的实际运作逻辑：在基层治理中，情感资源的识别依赖于村庄熟人网络与乡土文化的制度性转化，情感治理将隐性情感资源转化为可动员的治理资本，通过情感唤醒、沟通与协调的“情理法”治理实践，以及制度嵌入、价值共识与文化传承等再生产机制，实现情感治理的常态化与规范化。最后，情感资源的治理模式为城市社区提供了重要经验，基层治理者应将工作重点从单纯的情感动员转向情感资源的重塑与再生产。

Emotional governance, as an emerging model of grassroots governance, is regarded as an effective approach to remedy the “temperature deficit” inherent in institutional and technocratic governance. However, in practice, emotional governance frequently over-relies on mobilization strategy, leading to challenges related to sustainability and the risk of emotional exhaustion. The case study in G Town, Jiaoling County, Meizhou City, Guangdong Province suggests that the identification of emotional resources depends on the institutional transformation of village acquaintance networks and indigenous cultural traditions, enabling the conversion of implicit emotional bonds into mobilizable governance capital. The “emotion-reason-law” governance practice, which involves emotional arousal, communication, and coordination, and the reproduction mechanism, which through institutional embedding, value consensus, and cultural inheritance, making the routinization and normalization of emotional governance come true. In conclusion, this emotional resource governance model provides crucial lessons for urban communities, grassroots managers should shift their focus from mere emotional mobilization to the reshaping and reproduction of emotional resources.